Zustand vs MobX: Which is Better for State Management?
State management is a crucial part of React applications, especially as they grow in complexity. Zustand and MobX are two popular state management libraries that offer different approaches to handling state. In this comparison, we will explore their key differences, advantages, and use cases to help you decide which one is best for your project.
1. Introduction to Zustand and MobX
What is Zustand?
Zustand is a lightweight, flexible, and minimalistic state management library for React applications. It provides a simple API with a focus on performance and ease of use. Zustand eliminates unnecessary re-renders by tracking state changes efficiently and works well with both small and large-scale applications.
What is MobX?
MobX is a reactive state management library that follows the principle of automatic reactivity. It uses observables to automatically update components when the state changes, without requiring explicit subscriptions or selectors. MobX makes state management easier by reducing boilerplate and providing a more declarative approach.
2. Key Differences Between Zustand and MobX
Feature | Zustand | MobX |
---|---|---|
Complexity | Simple and minimalistic | More abstract but powerful |
Boilerplate | Very little boilerplate | Requires observables and actions |
Performance | Optimized re-renders with useStore | Efficient but can cause unintended reactivity |
State Structure | Uses plain objects and functions | Uses observables and computed values |
Learning Curve | Easy to learn | Moderate learning curve |
Reactivity | Manual state updates with hooks | Automatic reactivity with observables |
Scalability | Works well for small and large apps | Best suited for large applications |
DevTools Support | Supports Redux DevTools | Supports MobX DevTools |
Async State Handling | Simple async handling with functions | Supports async state with actions |
3. Code Comparison: Zustand vs MobX
Example: Counter Application
Zustand Implementation
Step 1: Install Zustand
npm install zustand
Step 2: Create a Zustand Store
import { create } from 'zustand';
const useCounterStore = create((set) => ({
count: 0,
increment: () => set((state) => ({ count: state.count + 1 })),
decrement: () => set((state) => ({ count: state.count - 1 }))
}));
export default useCounterStore;
Step 3: Use Zustand Store in a Component
import React from 'react';
import useCounterStore from './store';
const Counter = () => {
const { count, increment, decrement } = useCounterStore();
return (
<div>
<p>Count: {count}</p>
<button onClick={increment}>+</button>
<button onClick={decrement}>-</button>
</div>
);
};
export default Counter;
✅ Why Zustand?
✔ Simple setup with just one function (create
)
✔ No need for reducers or actions
✔ Optimized for performance
MobX Implementation
Step 1: Install MobX
shCopyEditnpm install mobx mobx-react
Step 2: Create a MobX Store
import { makeAutoObservable } from 'mobx';
class CounterStore {
count = 0;
constructor() {
makeAutoObservable(this);
}
increment() {
this.count++;
}
decrement() {
this.count--;
}
}
const counterStore = new CounterStore();
export default counterStore;
Step 3: Use MobX Store in a Component
import React from 'react';
import { observer } from 'mobx-react';
import counterStore from './store';
const Counter = observer(() => {
return (
<div>
<p>Count: {counterStore.count}</p>
<button onClick={() => counterStore.increment()}>+</button>
<button onClick={() => counterStore.decrement()}>-</button>
</div>
);
});
export default Counter;
✅ Why MobX?
✔ Automatically updates the UI when the state changes
✔ Less manual state handling compared to Zustand
✔ Uses observables for reactive state management
4. Performance Considerations
Zustand Performance
- Zustand minimizes re-renders by only updating components that depend on the changed state.
- Uses shallow state comparison to prevent unnecessary updates.
- Best for applications that require high performance with minimal overhead.
MobX Performance
- MobX automatically tracks dependencies, but if not used correctly, it can cause unwanted reactivity and extra re-renders.
- Computed values help optimize performance by recalculating only when needed.
- Best for applications with complex relationships between state values.
🏆 Winner: Zustand (More optimized for re-renders)
5. Learning Curve and Simplicity
Zustand is easier to learn because:
- It has no decorators or complex reactivity rules.
- The API is minimal and straightforward.
- Uses plain functions and objects, making it familiar for JavaScript developers.
MobX is slightly harder to learn because:
- It requires an understanding of observables, actions, and computed values.
- The automatic reactivity can be unintuitive for beginners.
- Some advanced features, like MobX-State-Tree, add complexity.
🏆 Winner: Zustand (More beginner-friendly)
6. Use Cases: When to Use Zustand vs MobX?
When to Use Zustand
✔ You need simple and minimal state management.
✔ Your app requires optimized performance with fewer re-renders.
✔ You want an easy-to-use API with less boilerplate.
✔ Your project is small to medium-sized, or you prefer a lightweight solution.
When to Use MobX
✔ Your app has complex state relationships (e.g., forms, large data structures).
✔ You want automatic reactivity without manually tracking dependencies.
✔ You prefer a more declarative approach to state management.
✔ Your application is large-scale and requires organized state management.
7. Developer Experience
Zustand Developer Experience
- ✅ Easier to debug (because of the Redux DevTools integration).
- ✅ Simple, functional approach that feels natural in React.
- ✅ Less code and better readability.
MobX Developer Experience
- ✅ Less manual state management (reactivity takes care of updates).
- ✅ Powerful computed values for derived state calculations.
- ❌ Can be harder to debug due to automatic reactivity.
🏆 Winner: Zustand (More straightforward and easier to debug)
8. Conclusion: Which One is Better?
🏆 Use Zustand if:
✔ You want a lightweight, simple state management solution.
✔ You need optimized re-renders for better performance.
✔ You prefer a minimal API with less boilerplate.
✔ You are working on a small to medium-sized project.
🏆 Use MobX if:
✔ You need automatic reactivity without manually tracking state changes.
✔ You are building a large-scale application with complex state logic.
✔ You prefer a more declarative state management approach.
Final Recommendation
If you need complex, reactive state management with computed values ➝ Use MobX.
If you’re new to state management or need a simple, efficient solution ➝ Use Zustand.